Showing 3 results for Emergency Service
Hadi Hassankhani, Hamidreza Haririan, Joanne E Porter, Abraham Oshni Alvandi,
Volume 20, Issue 1 (4-2023)
Abstract
Background: Patient handover in the emergency department (ED) is a 2-way communication process between the paramedics and in-hospital emergency personnel, which can result in miscommunication and delivery challenges. This study aimed to explore the lived experience of paramedics on patient handover to the ED.
Methods: Over a period of 5 months, an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to explore the lived experiences of 15 paramedics in Tabriz, Iran. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in the emergency medical stations using the Smith approach for data collection and analysis. The researcher used 4 criteria to ensure rigor, including credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability, according to Lincoln and Guba.
Results: Three main themes emerged from the data analysis, including “the hole of hope,” “the boring issues,” and “paramedics are only a driver.” A further 11 sub-themes emerged under the main themes.
Conclusion: The highlighted issues that need to be considered during the process are the presence of staff in front of the ED's door to welcome the patient, removal of structural defects and defective hospital equipment, the presence of medical supplies in emergency triage to prevent the paramedics from stumbling, and listening to paramedics by physicians and nurses to obtain the patients’ history.
Azize Aydemir, Mustafa Ayyildiz,
Volume 21, Issue 1 (4-2024)
Abstract
Background: Defining the emergency nursing approach to trauma patients and identifying deficiencies is crucial for providing effective, fast, safe, and high-quality emergency nursing care in the future. This study aimed to describe the nursing activities of emergency nurses working in a tertiary university hospital in the province of Samsun, located in the Eastern Black Sea Region of Türkiye, regarding the emergency nursing approach to trauma cases over a 1-year period.
Methods: The research was conducted with a mixed method using data from 2018. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were employed to define the emergency nursing approach to trauma cases in the emergency department (ED). Data were collected through a retrospective review of medical records of trauma patients (N=2540) in the ED and focus group discussions with 10 emergency nurses. The data extracted from the medical records of ED trauma patients were compared in terms of compliance with the emergency nursing job descriptions specified in the Nursing Regulation (NR) and the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA) emergency nursing guide. Quantitative data were reported using frequency and percentage, while content analysis was performed for qualitative data. Content analysis involved coding, identifying themes, and organizing data according to the codes and themes that were determined.
Results: The study revealed that ED nurses primarily assessed vital signs (81.5%) and consciousness (34.8%) and focused on activities related to the circulatory system (56%) in their nursing interventions. The research also indicated that the nurses' knowledge regarding the primary and secondary evaluation of emergency patients was insufficient. Although not currently a requirement in Türkiye, nurses expressed that obtaining emergency nursing education should be a prerequisite for working in the ED.
Conclusion: The study found that ED nurses in Türkiye lacked a systematic guideline for approaching trauma patients, and there was inadequate adherence to ENA guidelines in practice. Additionally, independent nursing interventions that enhance the influence, visibility, and autonomy of the nursing profession were not being implemented in the ED.
Tannaz Baradarani, Fariborz Roshangar, Faranak Jabbarzadeh Tabrizi , Parvin Sarbakhsh, Kobra Parvan,
Volume 21, Issue 2 (6-2024)
Abstract
Background: Diagnostic thinking and clinical competence are the two main domains of efficient nursing care. This study assessed the association between diagnostic thinking and clinical competence among emergency nurses.
Methods: The present correlation study was conducted in 2020 on 113 nurses working in emergency departments in a northwestern province of Iran over two consecutive years. A stratified random sampling method was used for recruiting nurses. Data was gathered via a demographic questionnaire, the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory, and the Nurse Competence Scale and analyzed using the SPSS 18 software. Pearson's correlation assessed the association between the nurses' diagnostic thinking and clinical competence at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: According to the findings, the nurses’ diagnostic thinking abilities were poor (154.15 ±15.73, range of 150-155), while their clinical competence was good (61.62±18.97, range of 51-75). Significant correlations emerged between thinking flexibility, work role (r=0.22, p=0.017), and memory structure. In addition, thinking flexibility was significantly associated with work role (r=0.22, P=0.017), and memory structure was correlated with teaching-coaching function (r=0.22, P=0.015), diagnostic functions (r=0.25, P=0.006), management of situations (r=0.45, P=0.0001), therapeutic interventions (r=0.42, P=0.0001), regimens (r=0.18, P=0.056), and work role (r=0.4, P=0.0001).
Conclusion: Amplifying thinking procedures and using diagnostic thinking patterns enhance emergency nurses' practice, performance, and clinical competence and promote nursing care. Lecturers and planners must employ modern educational methods to increase nurses' thinking skills and clinical competence.
