Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Maleka

Bijan Pirnia, Hasan Mosazadeh, Babak Lotfi, Fariborz Pirnia, Kambiz Pirnia, Parastoo Malekanmehr,
Volume 18, Issue 1 (5-2021)
Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a severe acute respiratory syndrome that emerged in early December 2019. Global proliferation, abrupt increases in confirmed cases, and the risk of self-infection have caused significant stress and anxiety among staff working in opioid treatment services (OTS). The aim of our study was to determine the psychological status of staff working in OTS during the outbreak period of COVID-19 in Tehran. 
Methods: In a short-term longitudinal survey, 621 staff members, including physicians, psychologists, nurses, and social workers, who were selected using probability-based online panel. Data was gathered using online questionnaires including the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and the Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS). Longitudinal assessment of anxiety, depression, fatigue and sleep problems in three periods including pre-outbreak, outbreak, and non-epidemic outbreak was done through the online panel. Data were analyzed by paired t-test and repeated measures correlation.
Results: The rates of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sleep problems of the staff working in OTS during the outbreak period were significantly higher than that of the pre-outbreak period (P<0.001), and it remained significantly higher during the non-epidemic outbreak and did not decrease significantly (P>0.05). The correlation coefficient between the anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sleep problems was significant in all three periods and the highest correlation was in the outbreak period (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Mental health problems of staff were common during the outbreak of COVID-19. Mental health problems of staff can limit the effectiveness of addiction treatment programs in the long time.

Michael Alaghi , Mohammad Aref Kor , Maryam Maleka , Ali Moradi , Hamideh Feghhi , Fatemeh Mehravar ,
Volume 23, Issue 1 (3-2026)
Abstract

Background: Nurses' perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Iranian hospitals remain underexplored, particularly where formal CSR education is limited for academic nurses. Nurses' understanding of CSR-as conceptualized by Carroll's pyramid encompassing economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities-is crucial as they translate organizational commitments into patient care quality and safety. This study examined nurses’ perceptions of CSR and the associated factors.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2025 among 309 nurses from 12 hospitals affiliated with Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Participants were selected using stratified proportional sampling by hospital size with convenience sampling within strata. Organizational-level CSR was assessed using Carroll's CSR questionnaire (20 items; Cronbach's α=0.89; four dimensions; 5-point Likert scale, score range: 20-100). Associations between CSR scores and demographic factors (Age, gender, marital status, education, and ethnicity) and occupational factors (Work experience, clinical unit, and job title) were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Group differences were examined using one-way ANOVA, and multiple linear regression was used to identify factors independently associated with total CSR scores.
Results: The mean total CSR score was 72.39 ± 13.22 (Economic: 17.32 ± 3.67; legal: 18.68 ± 3.56; ethical: 18.35 ± 3.74; philanthropic: 18.04 ± 4.37). Significant associations were found with marital status (p=0.024, higher in single nurses), clinical unit (p=0.006, lowest in orthopedic, highest in dialysis/management units), and a weak negative correlation with age (r= -0.132, p=0.020) and work experience (r=-0.116, p=0.041). Multiple linear regression showed that marital status was independently associated with CSR scores (β = 0.120, p = 0.032). Compared with nurses in internal–surgical units, those working in orthopedic (β = -0.223, p < 0.001), emergency (β = -0.135, p = 0.040), and neonatal units (β = -0.113, p = 0.037) had significantly lower CSR scores. The model explained 12.1% of variance (adjusted R² = 0.121)
Conclusion: Nurses in hospitals demonstrated generally positive perceptions of corporate social responsibility. These perceptions were influenced more strongly by workplace factors-particularly the type of clinical unit-than by personal demographic characteristics. Improving organizational conditions and promoting ethical leadership may further enhance CSR awareness, professional performance, and the quality of patient care.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb